Circlworld
Back to Charter Hall

Learn

The Selection Committee — how material Treasurer decisions are made.

Some Treasurer matters are too significant for the Treasurer Council alone. They affect the Treasurer’s tier, their professional standing, their continued participation in the TEP, and potentially their reputation in the open profession. The Selection Committee is the independent panel that decides those matters — peers and Members of the Circles affected, balanced by an independent Chair, applying procedural protections proportionate to the stakes. Circlworld is not the decision-maker.

What the Committee is

A five-person panel constituted for each proceeding rather than as a standing body. Two senior Treasurers nominated by the Treasurer Council, two Members nominated by Town Hall, and one independent Chair appointed by the Help Office. Per-proceeding constitution prevents the Committee from becoming a quasi-permanent disciplinary body whose members develop bias from cumulative exposure. The Treasurer subject to the proceeding has the right to object to nominees with cause; the Independent Chair decides second-round objections.

What the Committee decides

Five categories of material decisions per Charter §1.1.

  1. Material tier promotions

    Applications for promotion to Community Architect (tier 4) and Circlworld Ambassador (tier 5). These are the most senior tiers; the Committee reviews fitness rather than the algorithm.

  2. Material tier demotions

    Demotion below Community Organiser (tier 2) on grounds of sustained conduct or performance failure. Demotions back into the routine algorithm range remain with the Treasurer Council; only demotions below the entry working tier reach the Committee.

  3. Removal from the TEP

    Per TEP Methodology §6.4 grounds — sustained material breach, upheld AUP violation, criminal activity in connection with Treasurer duties, or Committee finding of unfitness. Removal terminates TEP participation; the Treasurer remains a Member of Circlworld.

  4. Material Code of Conduct breach findings

    Breaches that may warrant tier demotion, programme suspension, or removal. Minor conduct issues remain with the Council for remediation; the Committee handles cases where the proposed remedy is significant.

  5. Appeals from Treasurer Council decisions

    A Treasurer dissatisfied with a Council decision under Council Charter §6.4 may appeal to the Committee. The Committee reviews on a fresh-look basis where the appeal raises procedural concerns or factual disputes.

What the Committee does not decide

Four boundaries — other bodies hold these.

Routes toWhat stays there
Treasurer CouncilRoutine tier progression; minor conduct issues addressable through remediation; aggregate compliance review.
Dispute Settlement CentreDisputes between Members of a Circle (the DSC mediates Circle-arising matters; the Committee handles Treasurer-as-Treasurer matters).
Circlworld directlyRegulatory obligations Circlworld holds (e.g. KYC compliance, sanctions screening). The Committee never substitutes for the platform on regulatory matters.
Town Hall + CouncilProgramme parameter changes — TEP rates, qualification thresholds, scholarship rules. The Committee adjudicates individual cases under existing rules; rule-changes go elsewhere.

Who sits on the Committee

Five panellists per proceeding. Three nominating bodies. Per Charter §2.1.

Procedural protections for the subject Treasurer

Eight rights per Charter §3.2. The Committee’s decisions are weighty; the procedure is built to match.

  1. Written notice

    Describes the substance of the matter, the grounds, the proposed outcome being considered, and the timeline. No surprises.

  2. Access to evidence

    Full copies of all evidence the Committee proposes to rely on, with reasonable time to review.

  3. Written response

    At least 30 days to submit a written response, with reasonable accommodations for jurisdictional difference and other access barriers.

  4. In-person (or video) hearing

    For material conduct findings, demotions below Community Organiser, removals from the TEP, and appeals from Council decisions, the Treasurer is entitled to address the Committee directly.

  5. Representation

    Supported by the Council in its institutional capacity, by the Help Office, or by independent advice of the Treasurer’s choosing — including legal representation at the Treasurer’s expense.

  6. Witnesses + cross-examination

    The Treasurer may call witnesses or submit witness statements on questions of fact, and may put questions to witnesses the Committee hears.

  7. Reasoned written decision

    Within 30 days of conclusion, the Committee issues a written decision setting out the grounds, evidence relied on, the Treasurer’s response, the analysis, the decision, any conditions or remediation, and the appeal route.

  8. Right of appeal

    To the Dispute Settlement Centre’s appellate procedure within 30 days of the written decision.

Standard of decision + voting

The Committee decides on the balance of probabilities. Where the matter alleges criminal conduct, the Committee may apply a higher standard appropriate to the seriousness — but the Committee’s findings are administrative, not criminal; criminal liability is for the criminal courts.

Decisions are by majority vote of all five members. The Independent Chair votes in all matters. Each member’s vote is recorded with the written decision, with reasons where the member’s view differs from the majority — dissents matter.

Default proceeding timeline

Per Charter §3.5. Extensions granted on reasonable request where access barriers exist.

StageDefault time
Notice to Treasurer; Committee constituted; proceeding opens14 days from initiation
Treasurer objection to nominees7 days
Help Office decision on objection14 days
Treasurer written response30 days
In-person (or video) hearing60–90 days
Committee written decision30 days after conclusion
Treasurer appeal to DSC30 days

What is public, what is confidential

Published

  • Committee composition for each proceeding (members named)
  • Procedural outcomes (objections, response received, hearing held)
  • Final reasoned decision (anonymised where appropriate; outcome + precedent value preserved)

Confidential

  • Substantive deliberations of the Committee
  • Personal Member-identifying material the subject Treasurer has not waived
  • Witness statements where confidentiality was a precondition
  • Evidence submitted under protective conditions

Why this matters to Members

The Committee exists to keep Circlworld out of the adjudicative role. The same person — a senior Treasurer, a Member from your constituency, an independent Chair — applies procedure when the stakes are highest. That structural separation is what allows the platform to honour the non-custodial principle on more than just funds.